FirePro S9170 vs Radeon RX Vega 5

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking716not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.80no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameVegaHawaii
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)8 July 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3202816
Core clock speedno data930 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt275 Watt
Texture fill rateno data163.7
Floating-point processing powerno data5.238 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data176
L1 Cacheno data704 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data32 GB
Memory bus widthno data512 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2020 8 July 2015
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 275 Watt

RX Vega 5 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 1733.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 5 and FirePro S9170. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 5 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro S9170 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
Radeon RX Vega 5
AMD FirePro S9170
FirePro S9170

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 236 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate FirePro S9170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 5 or FirePro S9170, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.