Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Radeon RX Vega 5

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking722not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.87no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameVegaDG2-512
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2020 (6 years ago)24 August 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3204096
Core clock speedno data1950 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data524.8
Floating-point processing powerno data16.79 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L2 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2020 24 August 2022
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 150 Watt

RX Vega 5 has 900% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Flex 170, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 5 and Data Center GPU Flex 170. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 5 is a notebook graphics card while Data Center GPU Flex 170 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 241 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 107 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Flex 170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 5 or Data Center GPU Flex 170, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.