Radeon Pro 575X vs RX Vega 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking848not rated
Place by popularity96not in top-100
Power efficiency14.09no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code namePicassoPolaris 20
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date6 January 2019 (6 years ago)18 March 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922048
Core clock speed300 MHz1096 MHz
Boost clock speed1001 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate12.01140.3
Floating-point processing power0.3844 TFLOPS4.489 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs12128
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data217.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2019 18 March 2019
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 120 Watt

RX Vega 3 has 700% lower power consumption.

Pro 575X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 3 and Radeon Pro 575X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 3 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 575X is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3
AMD Radeon Pro 575X
Radeon Pro 575X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 2238 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 24 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 3 or Radeon Pro 575X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.