Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB vs RX Vega 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking850not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.12no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code namePicassoNavi 31
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2019 (7 years ago)13 April 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1924480
Core clock speed300 MHz1895 MHz
Boost clock speed1001 MHz2525 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt281 Watt
Texture fill rate12.01707.0
Floating-point processing power0.3844 TFLOPS45.25 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs12280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L0 Cacheno data2.2 MB
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data280 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data864.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2019 13 April 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 281 Watt

RX Vega 3 has 1773% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800 48 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 3 and Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 3 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 2279 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 6 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 3 or Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.