Radeon Instinct MI100 vs RX Vega 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking848not rated
Place by popularity94not in top-100
Power efficiency14.10no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)CDNA 1.0 (2020)
GPU code namePicassoArcturus
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2019 (7 years ago)16 November 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1927680
Core clock speed300 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1001 MHz1502 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million50,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate12.01721.0
Floating-point processing power0.3844 TFLOPS23.07 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs12480
L1 Cacheno data1.9 MB
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,229 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2019 16 November 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 300 Watt

RX Vega 3 has 1900% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 3 and Radeon Instinct MI100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 3 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3
AMD Radeon Instinct MI100
Radeon Instinct MI100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 2253 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 59 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 3 or Radeon Instinct MI100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.