GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 vs Radeon RX Vega 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking826not rated
Place by popularity92not in top-100
Power efficiency13.92no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code namePicassoGP108
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2019 (6 years ago)12 March 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$79

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192384
Core clock speed300 MHz1152 MHz
Boost clock speed1001 MHz1379 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0133.10
Floating-point processing power0.3844 TFLOPS1.059 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs1224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x4
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR4
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1050 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2019 12 March 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 20 Watt

RX Vega 3 has an age advantage of 9 months, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 3 and GeForce GT 1030 DDR4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 3 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
GeForce GT 1030 DDR4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2174 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1220 votes

Rate GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 3 or GeForce GT 1030 DDR4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.