GMA vs Radeon RX Vega 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8451598
Place by popularity96not in top-100
Power efficiency14.07no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)
GPU code namePicassoCloverview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2019 (6 years ago)4 May 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed300 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speed1001 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.011.066
Floating-point processing power0.3844 TFLOPSno data
ROPs41
TMUs122

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.6ES 2.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 3 1149
+57350%
Samples: 2896
GMA 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 29 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 7 no data
Counter-Strike 2 22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Escape from Tarkov 9 no data
Far Cry 5 5 no data
Fortnite 14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 5 9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
Valorant 45−50 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 9−10 no data
Counter-Strike 2 5 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 23 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Dota 2 21 no data
Escape from Tarkov 10−11 no data
Far Cry 5 8−9 no data
Fortnite 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 9 no data
Metro Exodus 2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6 no data
Valorant 45−50 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Dota 2 19 no data
Escape from Tarkov 10−11 no data
Far Cry 5 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4 no data
Valorant 45−50 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Escape from Tarkov 6−7 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 14−16 no data

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Dota 2 8−9 no data
Escape from Tarkov 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2019 4 May 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm

RX Vega 3 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 3 and GMA. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3
Intel GMA
GMA

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 2233 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 12 votes

Rate GMA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 3 or GMA, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.