Radeon RX Vega Nano vs RX Vega 24 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameFenghuangVega 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4096
Core clock speed300 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz1546 MHz
Number of transistorsno data12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rateno data395.8
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data152 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data2048 Bit
Memory clock speed2400 MHz1600 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data409.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 175 Watt

RX Vega 24 Mobile has 75% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile and Radeon RX Vega Nano. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX Vega Nano is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile
Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano
Radeon RX Vega Nano

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 6 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile or Radeon RX Vega Nano, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.