HD Graphics P4700 vs Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameFenghuangHaswell GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateno data1 June 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data160
Core clock speed300 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistorsno data392 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt86 Watt
Texture fill rateno data26.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.416 TFLOPS
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2400 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.80

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 86 Watt

RX Vega 24 Mobile has a 57% more advanced lithography process.

HD Graphics P4700, on the other hand, has 16% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile and HD Graphics P4700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while HD Graphics P4700 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 7 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 19 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile or HD Graphics P4700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.