Arc B370 vs Radeon RX Vega 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgePanther Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2018 (8 years ago)27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1281280
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz2400 MHz
Manufacturing process technology12 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rateno data96.00
Floating-point processing powerno data6.144 TFLOPS
ROPsno data20
TMUsno data40
Ray Tracing Coresno data10
L1 Cacheno data640 KB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.9
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2018 27 January 2026
Chip lithography 12 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

RX Vega 2 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

Arc B370, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 2 and Arc B370. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 254 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc B370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 2 or Arc B370, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.