Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics vs RX Vega 11

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking604not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameRavenSpectre SL
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)17 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704256
Core clock speed300 MHz626 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHz847 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million2,410 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt17 Watt
Texture fill rate55.0410.02
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS0.3205 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs4416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.5 (6.0)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.31.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 May 2018 17 September 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 17 Watt

RX Vega 11 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

R5 Mobile Graphics, on the other hand, has 105.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 and Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop card while Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1736 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.