Radeon HD 8760 OEM vs RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking604not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.80no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameRavenCape Verde
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)8 January 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704640
Core clock speed300 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate55.0440.00
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS1.28 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs4440

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)5.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 May 2018 8 January 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 80 Watt

RX Vega 11 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 128.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 and Radeon HD 8760 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
AMD Radeon HD 8760 OEM
Radeon HD 8760 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1759 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 9 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8760 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.