ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX vs RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking656not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.89no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRavenR600
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 May 2018 (7 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704320
Core clock speed300 MHz743 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million720 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt240 Watt
Texture fill rate55.0411.89
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPSno data
ROPs816
TMUs4416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data315 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1656 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data106.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)4.0
OpenGL4.63.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 240 Watt

RX Vega 11 has a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 585.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 and Radeon HD 2900 XTX. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX
Radeon HD 2900 XTX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1973 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 or Radeon HD 2900 XTX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.