Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition vs Radeon RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking673not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.98no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRavenG80
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 May 2018 (7 years ago)5 March 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704128
Core clock speed300 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt171 Watt
Texture fill rate55.0438.40
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS0.3686 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs4432
L2 Cacheno data96 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data312 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1536 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)4.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 May 2018 5 March 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 171 Watt

RX Vega 11 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 388.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 and Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2012 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 or Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.