GeForce G210 OEM vs Radeon RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking679not rated
Place by popularity100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.00no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRavenG96C
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 May 2018 (7 years ago)26 May 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores70416
Core clock speed300 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate55.044.400
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS0.0432 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared504 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8.064 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)4.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 May 2018 26 May 2009
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 31 Watt

RX Vega 11 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

G210 OEM, on the other hand, has 12.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 and GeForce G210 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2054 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 74 votes

Rate GeForce G210 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 or GeForce G210 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.