GeForce FX 5200 Ultra Mac Edition vs Radeon RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking672not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.98no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameRavenNV34 A2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 May 2018 (7 years ago)6 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704no data
Core clock speed300 MHz325 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate55.041.300
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs444

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP Pro 8x
Lengthno data171 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared325 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data10.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0a
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 May 2018 6 March 2003
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm

RX Vega 11 has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 and GeForce FX 5200 Ultra Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra Mac Edition
GeForce FX 5200 Ultra Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2004 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate GeForce FX 5200 Ultra Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 or GeForce FX 5200 Ultra Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.