ATI FirePro V9800 vs Radeon RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking687not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.09no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameRavenCypress
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 May 2018 (8 years ago)9 September 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7041600
Core clock speed300 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate55.0468.00
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS2.72 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs4480
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1150 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data147.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)5.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 May 2018 9 September 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 250 Watt

RX Vega 11 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 186% more advanced lithography process, and 614% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 and FirePro V9800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V9800 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2086 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 19 votes

Rate FirePro V9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 or FirePro V9800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.