Data Center GPU Max NEXT vs Radeon RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking679not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.00no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameRavenRialto Bridge
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 May 2018 (7 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores70420480
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1251 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate55.042,048
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs441280

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGPOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared8192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared3.1 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data3,205 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 800 Watt

RX Vega 11 has 2186% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Max NEXT, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 and Data Center GPU Max NEXT. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2059 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 63 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max NEXT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 or Data Center GPU Max NEXT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.