ATI Radeon 9800 SE vs RX Vega 11 Embedded

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1539
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameRavenR350
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date19 April 2018 (7 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704no data
Core clock speed300 MHz378 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate55.041.512
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs444

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 8x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneFloppy

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared297 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data19.01 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 April 2018 1 March 2003
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm

RX Vega 11 Embedded has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded and Radeon 9800 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded
Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded
ATI Radeon 9800 SE
Radeon 9800 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 13 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded or Radeon 9800 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.