ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330 vs RX Vega 11 Embedded

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1376
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRavenM92
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 April 2018 (7 years ago)9 January 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores70480
Core clock speed300 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million242 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate55.043.600
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS0.072 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs448
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data9.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 April 2018 9 January 2009
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm

RX Vega 11 Embedded has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded and Mobility Radeon HD 4330. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded
Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330
Mobility Radeon HD 4330

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 62 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded or Mobility Radeon HD 4330, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.