GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1528
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.14
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameRavenNV36
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date19 April 2018 (7 years ago)23 October 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704no data
Core clock speed300 MHz475 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million82 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt46 Watt
Texture fill rate55.041.900
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs444

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 8x
Lengthno data229 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared453 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.5 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0a
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 April 2018 23 October 2003
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 46 Watt

RX Vega 11 Embedded has an age advantage of 14 years, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 31.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded and GeForce FX 5700 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded
Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5700 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded or GeForce FX 5700 Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.