GRID M60-4A vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated644
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.00
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameRavenGM204
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date19 April 2018 (7 years ago)30 August 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7042048
Core clock speed300 MHz557 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHz1178 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate55.04150.8
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS4.825 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs44128
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 April 2018 30 August 2015
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 225 Watt

RX Vega 11 Embedded has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 542.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded and GRID M60-4A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded is a desktop graphics card while GRID M60-4A is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded
Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded
NVIDIA GRID M60-4A
GRID M60-4A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID M60-4A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded or GRID M60-4A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.