GRID M40 vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated748
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data6.10
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameRavenGM107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date19 April 2018 (7 years ago)18 May 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704384
Core clock speed300 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate55.0433.06
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS0.7933 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs4432
L1 Cacheno data192 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1300 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data83.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 April 2018 18 May 2016
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

RX Vega 11 Embedded has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 43% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded and GRID M40. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded is a desktop graphics card while GRID M40 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 16 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 8 votes

Rate GRID M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded or GRID M40, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.