Radeon Pro V340 16 GB vs RX Vega 11 Efficient

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRavenVega 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date23 April 2018 (7 years ago)26 August 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7043584 ×2
Core clock speed300 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate55.00336.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power1.76 TFLOPS10.75 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs864 ×2
TMUs44224 ×2
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2048 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared945 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data483.8 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2018 26 August 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 230 Watt

RX Vega 11 Efficient has 557.1% lower power consumption.

Pro V340 16 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient and Radeon Pro V340 16 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro V340 16 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient
Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient
AMD Radeon Pro V340 16 GB
Radeon Pro V340 16 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V340 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient or Radeon Pro V340 16 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.