Radeon Pro 580X vs RX Vega 11 Efficient

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated340
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.23
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameRavenPolaris 20
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date23 April 2018 (7 years ago)18 March 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7042304
Core clock speed300 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate55.00172.8
Floating-point processing power1.76 TFLOPS5.53 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs44144
L1 Cacheno data576 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1695 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data217.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2018 18 March 2019
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 150 Watt

RX Vega 11 Efficient has 328.6% lower power consumption.

Pro 580X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient and Radeon Pro 580X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 580X is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient
Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient
AMD Radeon Pro 580X
Radeon Pro 580X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 92 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 580X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient or Radeon Pro 580X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.