Radeon HD 7970M X2 vs RX Vega 11 Efficient

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameRavenWimbledon
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 April 2018 (7 years ago)24 April 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7041280 ×2
Core clock speed300 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate55.0068.00 ×2
Floating-point processing power1.76 TFLOPS2.176 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs832 ×2
TMUs4480 ×2
L1 Cacheno data320 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPMXM-B (3.0)
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data153.6 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.46.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1 (1.2)
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2018 24 April 2012
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 200 Watt

RX Vega 11 Efficient has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 471.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient and Radeon HD 7970M X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 7970M X2 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient
Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient
AMD Radeon HD 7970M X2
Radeon HD 7970M X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 19 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7970M X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient or Radeon HD 7970M X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.