Playstation 5 Pro GPU vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRavenViola
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 April 2018 (6 years ago)7 November 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7043840
Core clock speed300 MHz2180 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz2350 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million10,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt232 Watt
Texture fill rate55.00564.0
Floating-point processing power1.76 TFLOPS36.1 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs44240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data
Lengthno data386 mm
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2018 7 November 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 232 Watt

RX Vega 11 Efficient has 562.9% lower power consumption.

Playstation 5 Pro GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient and Playstation 5 Pro GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient
Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient
AMD Playstation 5 Pro GPU
Playstation 5 Pro GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 16 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 56 votes

Rate Playstation 5 Pro GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.