Quadro4 200 NVS vs Radeon RX Vega 10

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking747not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.86no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameRavenNV17 A3
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date8 January 2019 (6 years ago)22 December 2003 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed300 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt11 Watt
Texture fill rate52.041.000
Floating-point processing power1.665 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs404

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 4x
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x LFH60

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2019 22 December 2003
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 11 Watt

RX Vega 10 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 971.4% more advanced lithography process, and 10% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 10 and Quadro4 200 NVS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 10 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro4 200 NVS is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Radeon RX Vega 10
NVIDIA Quadro4 200 NVS
Quadro4 200 NVS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1152 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Quadro4 200 NVS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 10 or Quadro4 200 NVS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.