AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
General info
Technical specs
Memory
Technologies
Benchmarks
Gaming
Conclusion
Cast your vote
User rating
Advices and comments
General info
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, release date and other general parameters.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines / CUDA cores
640
48
Core clock speed
no data
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
no data
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
15 Watt
Texture fill rate
no data
52.80
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Radeon RX Vega 10 and Iris Plus Graphics 640 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Interface
no data
PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
no data
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
no data
32 GB
Memory bus width
no data
64/128 Bit
Shared memory
-
+
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon RX Vega 10 and Iris Plus Graphics 640. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Display Connectors
no data
No outputs
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Quick Sync
no data
+
API support
APIs supported by Radeon RX Vega 10 and Iris Plus Graphics 640, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
DirectX 12_1
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
no data
6.4
OpenGL
no data
4.6
OpenCL
no data
2.1
Vulkan
-
1.1.103
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmarks performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
RX Vega 10
6.00 +2.4%
Iris Plus Graphics 640
5.86
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
RX Vega 10
113236
Iris Plus Graphics 640
145481 +28.5%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
RX Vega 10
15613 +38.8%
Iris Plus Graphics 640
11248
3DMark Fire Strike Score
RX Vega 10
2028 +54.8%
Iris Plus Graphics 640
1310
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
RX Vega 10
2272 +63%
Iris Plus Graphics 640
1394
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
RX Vega 10
3559 +49.6%
Iris Plus Graphics 640
2379
Passmark
RX Vega 10
1524 +2.4%
Iris Plus Graphics 640
1489
Gaming performance
Let's see how good Radeon RX Vega 10 and Iris Plus Graphics 640 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
2.4% faster in synthetic tests
Somewhat newer (26 October 2017 vs 3 January 2017)
Cheaper ($449.00 USD vs $669.00 USD)
More pipelines (640 vs 48)
Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
We are unaware of any advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 over AMD Radeon RX Vega 10.
So, RX Vega 10 or Iris Plus Graphics 640?
Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Radeon RX Vega 10 and Iris Plus Graphics 640, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Cast your vote
Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite graphics card.
Like
Like
