HD Graphics 32EU Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking680not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code nameRavenBay Trail GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 January 2019 (5 years ago)2 September 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64032
Core clock speed300 MHz311 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHz646 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate52.042.584
Floating-point processing power1.665 TFLOPS0.04134 TFLOPS
ROPs81
TMUs404

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPRing Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.0
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2019 2 September 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 4 Watt

RX Vega 10 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

HD Graphics 32EU Mobile, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 10 and HD Graphics 32EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Radeon RX Vega 10
Intel HD Graphics 32EU Mobile
HD Graphics 32EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1039 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 6 votes

Rate HD Graphics 32EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.