Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M vs Radeon RX Vega 10

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking753not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.95no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Gen. 4.5 (2008)
GPU code nameRavenGL40
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 January 2019 (7 years ago)1 October 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64010
Core clock speed300 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Wattno data
Texture fill rate52.04no data
Floating-point processing power1.665 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2019 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm

RX Vega 10 has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 10 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1171 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 196 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 10 or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.