GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand vs Radeon RX Vega 10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking745not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.84no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRavenGK104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date8 January 2019 (6 years ago)25 August 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401344
Core clock speed300 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHz980 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rate52.04109.8
Floating-point processing power1.665 TFLOPS2.634 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs40112
L1 Cacheno data112 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2019 25 August 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 170 Watt

RX Vega 10 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1600% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 10 and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 10 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Radeon RX Vega 10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1152 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 21 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 10 or GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.