GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition vs Radeon RX Vega 10

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking734not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.69no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRavenG84
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date8 January 2019 (6 years ago)17 April 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$159

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64032
Core clock speed300 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate52.049.600
Floating-point processing power1.665 TFLOPS0.0928 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs4016
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data24 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2019 17 April 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 47 Watt

RX Vega 10 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 370% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 10 and GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 10 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Radeon RX Vega 10
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1140 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 10 or GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.