GeForce 205 OEM vs Radeon RX Vega 10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking746not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.88no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRavenGT218
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date8 January 2019 (6 years ago)26 November 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64016
Core clock speed300 MHz589 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate52.044.712
Floating-point processing power1.665 TFLOPS0.04486 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs408
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2019 26 November 2009
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 31 Watt

RX Vega 10 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 210% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 10 and GeForce 205 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 10 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 205 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Radeon RX Vega 10
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
GeForce 205 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1152 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 10 votes

Rate GeForce 205 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 10 or GeForce 205 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.