Radeon RX Vega 2 vs RX 9060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking71not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.03no data
ArchitectureRDNA 4.0 (2025)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 44Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 August 2025 (recently)7 January 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792128
Core clock speed1700 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2990 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors29,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology4 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)132 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate334.9no data
Floating-point processing power21.43 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs112no data
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2518 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth322.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1ano data
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_1
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 August 2025 7 January 2018
Chip lithography 4 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 132 Watt 15 Watt

RX 9060 has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 200% more advanced lithography process.

RX Vega 2, on the other hand, has 780% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 9060 and Radeon RX Vega 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 9060 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 2 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 9060
Radeon RX 9060
AMD Radeon RX Vega 2
Radeon RX Vega 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon RX 9060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 245 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 9060 or Radeon RX Vega 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.