GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile vs Radeon RX 8060S
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 8060S and GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RX 8060S outperforms RTX 5050 Mobile by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 114 | 120 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 59.92 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | no data | GB207 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 24 June 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 40 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 2235 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz | 2520 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | no data | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 201.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 12.9 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 32 |
| TMUs | no data | 80 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 80 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 20 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 224.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.4 |
| CUDA | - | 12.0 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 103
+3%
| 100−110
−3%
|
| 1440p | 51
+13.3%
| 45−50
−13.3%
|
| 4K | 35
+16.7%
| 30−35
−16.7%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220−230
+1.4%
|
220−230
−1.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95−100
+2.1%
|
90−95
−2.1%
|
| God of War | 100−105
+2%
|
95−100
−2%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+0.7%
|
130−140
−0.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 215
−2.3%
|
220−230
+2.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95−100
+2.1%
|
90−95
−2.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 96
−33.3%
|
120−130
+33.3%
|
| Fortnite | 170−180
+1.7%
|
170−180
−1.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+1.9%
|
150−160
−1.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 120−130
+1.6%
|
120−130
−1.6%
|
| God of War | 100−105
+2%
|
95−100
−2%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160
+1.3%
|
150−160
−1.3%
|
| Valorant | 230−240
+1.3%
|
230−240
−1.3%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+0.7%
|
130−140
−0.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 109
−102%
|
220−230
+102%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+0%
|
270−280
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95−100
+2.1%
|
90−95
−2.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 95
−34.7%
|
120−130
+34.7%
|
| Fortnite | 170−180
+1.7%
|
170−180
−1.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+1.9%
|
150−160
−1.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 120−130
+1.6%
|
120−130
−1.6%
|
| God of War | 100−105
+2%
|
95−100
−2%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 127
−3.1%
|
130−140
+3.1%
|
| Metro Exodus | 95−100
+2.1%
|
95−100
−2.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160
+1.3%
|
150−160
−1.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 140−150
+2.1%
|
140−150
−2.1%
|
| Valorant | 230−240
+1.3%
|
230−240
−1.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+0.7%
|
130−140
−0.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95−100
+2.1%
|
90−95
−2.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 92
−39.1%
|
120−130
+39.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+1.9%
|
150−160
−1.9%
|
| God of War | 100−105
+2%
|
95−100
−2%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160
+1.3%
|
150−160
−1.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 101
−42.6%
|
140−150
+42.6%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 170−180
+1.7%
|
170−180
−1.7%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 71
−43.7%
|
100−110
+43.7%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 280−290
+1.4%
|
280−290
−1.4%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 70
−17.1%
|
80−85
+17.1%
|
| Metro Exodus | 60−65
+1.7%
|
55−60
−1.7%
|
| Valorant | 260−270
+1.1%
|
260−270
−1.1%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110
+1%
|
100−110
−1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
+2.1%
|
45−50
−2.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 95−100
+2.1%
|
95−100
−2.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+2.6%
|
110−120
−2.6%
|
| God of War | 50−55
+1.9%
|
50−55
−1.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 75−80
+2.6%
|
75−80
−2.6%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 100−110
+1.9%
|
100−110
−1.9%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 36
−30.6%
|
45−50
+30.6%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 76
−14.5%
|
85−90
+14.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 65−70
+1.6%
|
60−65
−1.6%
|
| Valorant | 240−250
+1.2%
|
240−250
−1.2%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+1.6%
|
60−65
−1.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+3.8%
|
50−55
−3.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+2.6%
|
75−80
−2.6%
|
| God of War | 35−40
+2.9%
|
35−40
−2.9%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+3.6%
|
55−60
−3.6%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 50−55
+1.9%
|
50−55
−1.9%
|
This is how RX 8060S and RTX 5050 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RX 8060S is 3% faster in 1080p
- RX 8060S is 13% faster in 1440p
- RX 8060S is 17% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Far Cry 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 8060S is 4% faster.
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5050 Mobile is 102% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 8060S performs better in 45 tests (76%)
- RTX 5050 Mobile performs better in 11 tests (19%)
- there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 40.30 | 39.29 |
| Recency | 6 January 2025 | 24 June 2025 |
RX 8060S has a 2.6% higher aggregate performance score.
RTX 5050 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 8060S and GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
