Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs Radeon RX 7900 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation37.76no data
Power efficiency17.17no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 31GA10B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 November 2022 (2 years ago)March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5376512
Core clock speed1387 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed2394 MHzno data
Number of transistors57,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate804.410.00
Floating-point processing power51.48 TFLOPS0.64 TFLOPS
ROPs1928
TMUs33616
Tensor Coresno data16
Ray Tracing Cores84no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length276 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5
Maximum RAM amount20 GB4 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz1067 MHz
Memory bandwidth800.0 GB/s34.14 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 20 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 10 Watt

RX 7900 XT has a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB, on the other hand, has 2900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7900 XT and Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7900 XT is a desktop card while Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Radeon RX 7900 XT
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1794 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.