Quadro M3000 SE vs Radeon RX 7800M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking126not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.81no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameNavi 32GM204
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 September 2024 (1 year ago)2 October 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38401024
Core clock speed1295 MHz540 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,100 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate560.434.56
Floating-point processing power35.87 TFLOPS1.106 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs24064
Ray Tracing Cores60no data
L0 Cache960 KBno data
L1 Cache768 KB384 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
L3 Cache48 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/s160.4 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.21.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2024 2 October 2016
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 75 Watt

RX 7800M has an age advantage of 7 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

M3000 SE, on the other hand, has 140% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7800M and Quadro M3000 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7800M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M3000 SE is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Quadro M3000 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7800M or Quadro M3000 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.