GeForce 210 PCI vs Radeon RX 7800M
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 136 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 16.04 | no data |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025) | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
| GPU code name | Navi 32 | GT216 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 11 September 2024 (1 year ago) | 12 October 2009 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3840 | 16 |
| Core clock speed | 1295 MHz | 475 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2335 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 28,100 million | 486 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 31 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 560.4 | 3.800 |
| Floating-point processing power | 35.87 TFLOPS | 0.0352 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 96 | 4 |
| TMUs | 240 | 8 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | no data |
| L0 Cache | 960 KB | no data |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 KB |
| L3 Cache | 48 MB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCI |
| Length | no data | 145 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 6.4 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 11.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 1.2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 September 2024 | 12 October 2009 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 512 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 31 Watt |
RX 7800M has an age advantage of 14 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
210 PCI, on the other hand, has 480.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7800M and GeForce 210 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX 7800M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 210 PCI is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
