FirePro S10000 Passive vs Radeon RX 7800M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking126not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.81no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 32Tahiti
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 September 2024 (1 year ago)12 November 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38403584 ×2
Core clock speed1295 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rate560.4106.4 ×2
Floating-point processing power35.87 TFLOPS3.405 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs9632 ×2
TMUs240112 ×2
Ray Tracing Cores60no data
L0 Cache960 KBno data
L1 Cache768 KB448 KB
L2 Cache4 MB768 KB
L3 Cache48 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data305 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB6 GB ×2
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/s480 GB/s ×2
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.85.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.21.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2024 12 November 2012
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 750 Watt

RX 7800M has an age advantage of 11 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 317% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7800M and FirePro S10000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7800M is a notebook graphics card while FirePro S10000 Passive is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate FirePro S10000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7800M or FirePro S10000 Passive, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.