Arc 7 A780 vs Radeon RX 7800M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking124not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.46no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 32DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 September 2024 (less than a year ago)2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38404096
Core clock speed1295 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2335 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate560.4563.2
Floating-point processing power35.87 TFLOPS18.02 TFLOPS
ROPs96128
TMUs240256
Ray Tracing Cores60no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount12 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz17.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/s559.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 200 Watt

RX 7800M has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

Arc 7 A780, on the other hand, has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7800M and Arc 7 A780. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7800M is a notebook graphics card while Arc 7 A780 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7800M
Radeon RX 7800M
Intel Arc 7 A780
Arc 7 A780

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 12 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 35 votes

Rate Arc 7 A780 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7800M or Arc 7 A780, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.