GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample vs Radeon RX 7800 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking30not rated
Place by popularity40not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation68.05no data
Power efficiency16.45no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameNavi 32NV36S
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 August 2023 (1 year ago)18 August 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840no data
Core clock speed1295 MHz425 MHz
Boost clock speed2430 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,100 million82 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)263 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate583.21.700
Floating-point processing power37.32 TFLOPSno data
ROPs964
TMUs2404
Ray Tracing Cores60no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2438 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth624.1 GB/s8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.11x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0a
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (full) 2.0 (partial)
OpenCL2.2N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 August 2023 18 August 2003
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 5 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 263 Watt 25 Watt

RX 7800 XT has an age advantage of 20 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5700 Engineering Sample, on the other hand, has 952% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7800 XT and GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample
GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2933 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.