Radeon R7 M350 2GB vs RX 7700 XT
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 59 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 71.53 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 16.97 | no data |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | Navi 32 | Litho |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 25 August 2023 (2 years ago) | 5 May 2015 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3456 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1435 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2544 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 28,100 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 245 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 549.5 | 19.80 |
| Floating-point processing power | 35.17 TFLOPS | 0.6336 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 96 | 8 |
| TMUs | 216 | 24 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 54 | no data |
| L0 Cache | 864 KB | no data |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 128 KB |
| L3 Cache | 48 MB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C | Portable Device Dependent |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.5 (5.1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | 2.1 (1.2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.2.170 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 25 August 2023 | 5 May 2015 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
RX 7700 XT has an age advantage of 8 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7700 XT and Radeon R7 M350 2GB. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX 7700 XT is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R7 M350 2GB is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
