Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs Radeon RX 7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

RX 7600
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 165 Watt
42.12
+1466%

Radeon RX 7600 outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 685 by a whopping 1466% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking80773
Place by popularity66not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation38.190.66
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022)no data
GPU code nameNavi 33no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date24 May 2023 (1 year ago)6 December 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 no data
Current price$352 (1.3x MSRP)$1429

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7600 has 5686% better value for money than Qualcomm Adreno 685.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed1720 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2655 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate339.8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 7600 and Qualcomm Adreno 685 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length204 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed18000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1no data
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600 42.12
+1466%
Qualcomm Adreno 685 2.69

Radeon RX 7600 outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 685 by 1466% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 7600 16267
+1724%
Qualcomm Adreno 685 892

Radeon RX 7600 outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 685 by 1724% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 7600 43430
+2154%
Qualcomm Adreno 685 1927

Radeon RX 7600 outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 685 by 2154% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD137
+1613%
8−9
−1613%
1440p68
+1600%
4−5
−1600%
4K38
+1800%
2−3
−1800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 148
+2860%
5−6
−2860%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+1360%
5−6
−1360%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+1725%
4−5
−1725%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+3275%
4−5
−3275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+1114%
7−8
−1114%
Cyberpunk 2077 117
+2240%
5−6
−2240%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+1700%
5−6
−1700%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+1386%
7−8
−1386%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+1318%
10−12
−1318%
Hitman 3 85−90
+1333%
6−7
−1333%
Horizon Zero Dawn 323
+1694%
18−20
−1694%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+1571%
7−8
−1571%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+1550%
6−7
−1550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 284
+2267%
12−14
−2267%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+531%
16−18
−531%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+1360%
5−6
−1360%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+1725%
4−5
−1725%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+3275%
4−5
−3275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+1114%
7−8
−1114%
Cyberpunk 2077 100
+1900%
5−6
−1900%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+1700%
5−6
−1700%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+1386%
7−8
−1386%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+1318%
10−12
−1318%
Hitman 3 85−90
+1333%
6−7
−1333%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+856%
18−20
−856%
Metro Exodus 77
+1825%
4−5
−1825%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+1550%
6−7
−1550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 230
+1817%
12−14
−1817%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 210
+2900%
7−8
−2900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+531%
16−18
−531%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+1360%
5−6
−1360%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+1725%
4−5
−1725%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+1114%
7−8
−1114%
Cyberpunk 2077 90
+1700%
5−6
−1700%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+1700%
5−6
−1700%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+1318%
10−12
−1318%
Horizon Zero Dawn 172
+856%
18−20
−856%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 199
+1558%
12−14
−1558%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 123
+1657%
7−8
−1657%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+531%
16−18
−531%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+1550%
6−7
−1550%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+1950%
4−5
−1950%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+3200%
3−4
−3200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+2200%
2−3
−2200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+1467%
3−4
−1467%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+1200%
5−6
−1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Far Cry 5 115
+2775%
4−5
−2775%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+2125%
4−5
−2125%
Hitman 3 55−60
+588%
8−9
−588%
Horizon Zero Dawn 127
+1714%
7−8
−1714%
Metro Exodus 118
+1586%
7−8
−1586%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129
+1513%
8−9
−1513%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 86
+4200%
2−3
−4200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+1117%
6−7
−1117%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Hitman 3 30−35
+1600%
2−3
−1600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+1700%
3−4
−1700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 42
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+1867%
3−4
−1867%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1867%
3−4
−1867%
Horizon Zero Dawn 72
+2300%
3−4
−2300%
Metro Exodus 62
+1140%
5−6
−1140%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+850%
4−5
−850%

This is how RX 7600 and Qualcomm Adreno 685 compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600 is 1613% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600 is 1600% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600 is 1800% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7600 is 5500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7600 surpassed Qualcomm Adreno 685 in all 58 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.12 2.69
Recency 24 May 2023 6 December 2018
Chip lithography 6 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 7 Watt

The Radeon RX 7600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm Adreno 685 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7600 is a desktop card while Qualcomm Adreno 685 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
Qualcomm Adreno 685
Adreno 685

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1351 vote

Rate Radeon RX 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 14 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 685 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.