GeForce RTX TITAN Ada vs Radeon RX 7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking91not rated
Place by popularity81not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation92.06no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 33AD102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date24 May 2023 (1 year ago)2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204818432
Core clock speed1720 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2655 MHz2625 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate339.81,512
Floating-point processing power21.75 TFLOPS96.77 TFLOPS
ROPs64192
TMUs128576
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length204 mm336 mm
Width2-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount8 GB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz24 GB/s
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s1,152 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.11x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 800 Watt

RX 7600 has 384.8% lower power consumption.

RTX TITAN Ada, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7600 and GeForce RTX TITAN Ada. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
NVIDIA GeForce RTX TITAN Ada
GeForce RTX TITAN Ada

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1659 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 12 votes

Rate GeForce RTX TITAN Ada on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.