GeForce RTX 3070 6144SP vs Radeon RX 7600 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking80not rated
Place by popularity96not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation78.19no data
Power efficiency16.18no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 33GA104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20486144
Core clock speed1980 MHz1740 MHz
Boost clock speed2755 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt290 Watt
Texture fill rate352.6339.8
Floating-point processing power22.57 TFLOPS21.75 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs128192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Cores3248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length204 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.11x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 290 Watt

RX 7600 XT has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 52.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7600 XT and GeForce RTX 3070 6144SP. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
Radeon RX 7600 XT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 6144SP
GeForce RTX 3070 6144SP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 628 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 6144SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.