GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Radeon RX 7500 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated6
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data30.28
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameNavi 33AD103-275
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2023 (1 year ago)24 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799
Current priceno data$820 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10248448
Core clock speedno data2340 MHz
Boost clock speed2300 MHz2610 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate147.2689.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data310 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed18 GB/s21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth216.0 GB/s716.8 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDAno data8.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 285 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7500 XT and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7500 XT
Radeon RX 7500 XT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 49 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1418 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.