Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB vs RX 6950 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking25not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation33.77no data
Power efficiency15.44no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameNavi 21Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 May 2022 (3 years ago)13 April 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,099 $2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51204480
Core clock speed1925 MHz1895 MHz
Boost clock speed2324 MHz2525 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)335 Watt281 Watt
Texture fill rate743.7707.0
Floating-point processing power23.8 TFLOPS45.25 TFLOPS
ROPs128128
TMUs320280
Ray Tracing Cores8070
L0 Cache1.3 MB2.2 MB
L1 Cache1 MB2 MB
L2 Cache4 MB6 MB
L3 Cache128 MB96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm280 mm
Width3-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 May 2022 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 335 Watt 281 Watt

PRO W7800 48 GB has an age advantage of 11 months, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 19% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6950 XT and Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6950 XT is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 2985 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6950 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 6 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6950 XT or Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.