T400 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking34not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.24no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 21TU117
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 October 2020 (5 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4608896
Boost clock speed2105 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors23,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)255 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate606.279.80
Floating-point processing power19.4 TFLOPS2.554 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs28856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed16 GB/s10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s80 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 255 Watt 18 Watt

RX 6900 has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

T400 Mobile, on the other hand, has 1316.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6900 and T400 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6900 is a desktop graphics card while T400 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6900
Radeon RX 6900
NVIDIA T400 Mobile
T400 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 90 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate T400 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6900 or T400 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.