GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs Radeon RX 6900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking34not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.24no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 21GT218
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 October 2020 (5 years ago)17 April 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores460816
Core clock speedno data520 MHz
Boost clock speed2105 MHzno data
Number of transistors23,000 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)255 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate606.24.160
Floating-point processing power19.4 TFLOPS0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs2888
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCI
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed16 GB/s500 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s8 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.54.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 October 2020 17 April 2007
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 255 Watt 40 Watt

RX 6900 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

8400 GS PCI Rev. 2, on the other hand, has 537.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6900 and GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6900
Radeon RX 6900
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 90 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 11 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6900 or GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.